Polarization

In the hydrogen plus proton model of Eqn. (3) we have assumed that the electronic wave function/orbital rests on center a. What if we allow the orbital to move off center toward the bond midpoint, as described in Figure 1?

\(\psi=\phi_a\)


Figure 1. Polarization model for the interaction between a proton and hydrogen atom.

In this case, the \(-\zeta\) term in Eqn. (9) is replaced by a distance-dependent term, see Eqn. \eqref{eq:en_polmod}.

\(v_{aa}=-\zeta+\left\{\zeta e^{-2\zeta R_{ab}}+\frac{e^{-2\zeta R_{ab}}-1}{R_{ab}}\right\}\)


\begin{equation} {E_a} = \left\{ {\zeta {e^{ - 2\zeta {r_a}}} + \frac{{\left( {{e^{ - 2\zeta {r_a}}} - 1} \right)}}{{{r_a}}}} \right\} + \left\{ {\zeta {e^{ - 2\zeta {r_b}}} + \frac{{\left( {{e^{ - 2\zeta {r_b}}} - 1} \right)}}{{{r_b}}}} \right\} + \frac{1}{{{R_{ab}}}} \label{eq:en_polmod} \end{equation}


Since we are interested in bonding we'll again use hydrogen atom as our reference. The potential curve for this expression is given in Figure 2 for an internuclear distance of 3Å.

Click to rotate image.

Reset
Figure 2. Polarization potential curve, Eqn. \eqref{eq:en_polmod}, for the interaction between a proton and hydrogen atom, internuclear distance \(R_{ab}=3\unicode{x212B}\), \(\zeta=1\).

This model demonstrates that build up of electron density between centers is not energetically attractive. Placing the electron symmetrically between the nuclei is nearly 300 kcal/mol uphill. In the region near R=0 we can see that the model of Eqn. \eqref{eq:en_polmod} and Figure 1 permits atomic electron density to be slightly polarized off-center due to charged particles or electric fields. This polarization effect should be included in the models of charged systems.6

Page 5